Complete Articles & Reviews

A roundup of summer classical music books – Boston Globe

Third Ear
August 04, 2012
|

Music books don’t often make it onto summer reading lists, perhaps because they don’t quite fit the vision of that mythically languorous afternoon on the beach — you know, the sand between your toes, the fruity cocktail in hand, and on your lap that probing new study of the piano playing of Friedrich Nietzsche?

But it’s August, it’s vacation time (at least in Europe), and chances are it’s a good moment to catch up on a music book or two you might have missed over the past year. So, herewith, the inaugural Third Ear Summer Reading Edition.

A good place to start might well be at the beginning, at least when it comes to the Boston Symphony Orchestra, which is to say, with Henry Lee Higginson.

For almost all of its first four decades, Higginson of course ran the show. He was the orchestra’s “inventor, owner, and operator” — as the cultural historian Joseph Horowitz describes him in the elegant and warmly sympathetic essay that forms one-quarter of his new book, “Moral Fire: Musical Portraits From America’s Fin de Siècle.”

Horowitz has more broadly set out to upend our received notions of America’s Gilded Age and its supposedly genteel high culture, by summoning the stories of four cultural figures who believed passionately in music as a force of moral empowerment. (Besides Higginson, he spotlights Laura Langford, Henry Krehbiel, and Charles Ives.) That larger linkage between classical music and moral uplift, as the book readily concedes, has not aged well since Higginson’s day, with the coolly detached ironies of Stravinskian modernism on the one hand, and the musical politics of murderous totalitarian regimes on the other. But Horowitz still believes deeply, at times elegiacally, that there is much worth recovering here from the long-forgotten cultural passions of an earlier America, a late-19th-century moment when Wagnerites in New York might stand screaming on chairs, and an entire pioneering symphony orchestra could be built from the toils, fortunes, and idealism of a single man.

Higginson was of course no ordinary Boston philanthropist. He was a dual citizen of the business and artistic worlds, a State Street financier with a network in Vienna, a man who knew Brahms and J.P. Morgan, Hans Richter and Theodore Roosevelt. He traveled widely, spoke German and French, and kept a portrait of Emerson on his desk. Just as saliently his cultural vision for the Boston Symphony Orchestra — “a full and permanent orchestra, offering the best music at low prices,” as he put it in a now famous newspaper announcement in 1881 — was free of condescension or noblesse oblige.

It was not only his business fortune but these multiple fluencies, Horowitz suggests, coupled with a warm yet direct personal manner — “as spartan and crisp as he was affectionate” — that drove Higginson’s success. Wilhelm Gericke, one of the BSO’s earliest music directors, thought if anyone else besides Higginson had tried to found an orchestra in Boston, “it would not have reached the age of ten years.”

Horowitz opens his portrait with the drama of Higginson’s Civil War service, including a Virginia battle during which Higginson was thrown from his horse, shot in his back, cut on his face by a saber, and almost taken prisoner until he convinced a Confederate soldier to leave him to die. (He was found and brought back to Boston, where he recovered and even briefly re-enlisted. He retained his prominent saber scar for the rest of his life.)

Before joining the Army, Higginson had left an abbreviated college career at Harvard to spend long stretches of the 1850s living in Europe, primarily in Vienna, where he studied music intensely — piano, voice, and harmony — and drank in so many opera and concert performances that he often went without dinner to save on expenses.

Horowitz quotes from Higginson’s European correspondence with his Boston father, whose investment firm he would later join. In one remarkable letter defending his years of musical immersion abroad from any potential charge of frivolousness, the younger Higginson describes his study as building a permanent inner resource “to which I can always turn with delight, however the world may go with me. . . . I can then go with satisfaction to my business, knowing my resource at the end of the day.” He even inverted a financial metaphor, describing his newly acquired education as “imperishable capital.” He added: “My money may fly away; my knowledge cannot. One belongs to the world, the other to me.”

In the early decades of the BSO, Higginson chose the conductors (including George Henschel and Gericke, and later Arthur Nikisch and Karl Muck), hired and fired the musicians, many of them European, and covered all deficits. If he was a dictator he was a benevolent one, Horowitz argues, looking out for his orchestra while leading firmly when necessary. The results were self-evident. By 1902 Richard Strauss was calling the BSO “the most marvelous in the world.”

Higginson held onto the reins of the orchestra, without any board of directors, all the way until the final year of World War I. Horowitz suggests it was the war itself that ultimately proved Higginson’s undoing, and not only because Muck, a German, was arrested and interned as an enemy alien in Georgia. Higginson’s cosmopolitan idealism was simply of an earlier vintage, reflecting an inherited faith in an idea of humanity’s forward progress. “The Great War,” Horowitz writes, “extinguished the moral fires of the late nineteenth century.”

Telling Higginson’s story also here entails, by necessity, a vivid sketch of the orchestra’s early decades (including the Muck affair), and the building of Symphony Hall, which had even more of Higginson’s spirit in it than you may realize. The portrait is richer for these inclusions, and should be essential reading for anyone who wants to grasp the distinctive early history of the BSO or the cultural roots of modern-day Boston.

While we’re on the topic of the city’s prominent musical citizens, Gunther Schuller, now 86, has written a remarkable first volume of his memoirs, published this fall as “Gunther Schuller: A Life in Pursuit of Music and Beauty.” The book covers only his first 35 years, but it nonetheless seems like the events of many lifetimes are packed into these 600 pages.

As a composer, conductor, classical and jazz horn player, administrator, author, jazz historian, and record producer, Schuller seemingly has done it all in music. And because many of his interests developed in parallel, they collide joyfully in the pages of his memoir, too. Schuller writes about playing Wagner’s “Tristan und Isolde” under Fritz Busch at the Metropolitan Opera, and in the very next paragraph, remembers a warm reunion with Duke Ellington, who calls him “my horn-playing professor.”

The range of experiences and personalities encountered is astonishing, and turns this autobiography simultaneously into a street-level view of key decades in American music history. Schuller takes a personable, comprehensive approach, reconstructing it all in exhaustive detail, often with candor, humor, and a disarming openness. The book is dedicated to his late wife Marjorie, and her presence in one way or another is also ubiquitous. I can’t wait for volume two.

Meanwhile, across the river, the distinguished Harvard scholar Christoph Wolff has written a soberly persuasive new book about Mozart’s last days. In “Mozart at the Gateway to His Fortune,” Wolff argues that the composer’s late music should not in fact be heard as “late music,” that is, as autumnal art tinged with an awareness of closure, decline, and impending death. In fact the opposite in true. The title of the book paraphrases a letter Mozart wrote as late as 1790, a year before his death, when he saw himself as standing on the precipice of new artistic and professional breakthroughs, a self-assessment Wolff affirms in part by examining the forward-looking musical fragments Mozart left unfinished. Of the composer’s final illness, Wolff writes, splashing cold water on decades of old hoary myths, “it all might just as well have turned out differently.”

Perhaps the most unexpected music book I’ve come across this year is “The Philosopher’s Touch” by Francois Noudelmann, an artful meditation on Sartre, Nietzsche, and the literary critic Roland Barthes as passionate amateur pianists. At one point, we get a moving snapshot of the deranged Nietzsche toward the end of his life. Barely able to speak or write comprehensibly, this vanquished Zarathustra retreated to the keyboard, performing brilliantly for two hours every day on the upright piano in the cafeteria of his mental asylum. The playing was so powerfully articulate, one friend thought Nietzsche might be faking his madness.

Noudelmann more broadly savors the distance between the modernity and rigor of these thinkers’ public work and their unabashedly Romantic or sentimental tastes when they sat down alone at the keyboard. Sartre and Nietzsche loved Chopin, Barthes’s lodestar was Schumann. The book probes the meanings of these elective affinities, and speculates on both the yawning gaps and hidden passageways between intellectual and corporeal pleasures, the travails of the mind and the secret life of the fingers. So maybe, in a way, it’s beach reading after all, depending on your beach.

Jeremy Eichler can be reached at jeichler@
globe.com.

Permalink

The Ives Project: Beyond an innovator’s sound, to his spirit – The Washington Post

By Stephen Brookes • The Washington Post • October 30, 2011

It was January 10, 1931, and the mood at New York’s Town Hall was turning ugly. Conductor Nicolas Slonimsky had just led the orchestra through “Three Places in New England” by the little-known composer Charles Ives, and had been met with jeers. Things got even rowdier when Slonimsky launched into Carl Ruggles’s dissonant “Men and Mountains,” and when a listener stood up and loudly began to boo, Ives — who had quietly endured the catcalls for his own work — jumped to his feet.

“Stop being such a God-damned sissy!” he shouted at the heckler. “Why can’t you stand up before fine strong music like this and use your ears like a man!”

It was one of the more red-blooded moments in American music, and a classic gesture from Ives — a fiercely independent Connecticut Yankee who, though largely ignored in his lifetime, has come to be recognized as one of America’s most remarkable composers. In fact, he may be one of the most visionary — and strangely paradoxical — figures of the 20th century. A modernist who disliked the modern world, a self-made millionaire who championed the common man, Ives isolated himself from the musical world yet came up with virtually all of the innovations of 20th-century music — from wildly intricate rhythms to spacing musicians in different places in the concert hall— long before anyone else. And in the process, he wrote some of the most profound and quintessentially “American” music the world has ever heard.

“Ives is a larger-than-life personality — a legendary figure, something out of a storybook,” says Joseph Horowitz, a founder of the PostClassical Ensemble. “And he’s indisputably a great spirit.”

Horowitz is the driving force behind the Ives Project, a three-day festival of concerts and discussions this week at the Music Center at Strathmore, that kicks off Thursday with a multimedia “theatrical concert” tracing the composer’s life through his own words and music. Horowitz’s PostClassical Ensemble will be joined by some of the top Ives interpreters in the country — including baritone William Sharp, the Jack Quartet and the rising piano superstar Jeremy Denk — to probe the roots of Ives’s still-controversial music.

“Ives is, in a sense, a very autobiographical composer,” says Denk. “He delves into the magic of things that come from his youth.”

Ives’s iconoclastic path through music began, in fact, almost as soon as he could reach the keyboard. Ives, born in 1874 in Danbury, Conn., was encouraged by his father — the town’s bandmaster — to develop an eclectic, open-minded approach to music. He learned to sing in one key while his father played the piano in another, and was was exposed to a wide range of vernacular music, from hymns and patriotic marches to the ballads of Stephen Foster.

But his father’s key lesson was to ignore the surface appeal of music and look into its deeper meaning. Listening to a stonemason croaking his way through a hymn, he told the boy: “Don’t pay too much attention to the sounds, for if you do, you may miss the music. You won’t get a wild, heroic ride to heaven on pretty little sounds.”

Angel Gil-Ordonez will lead the PostClassical EnsembleThe advice stuck. Ives went on to study composition at Yale University but chafed at the convention-bound world of professional music and, after graduating, went into the insurance business instead. It was a crucial decision. Ives turned his back on the musical mainstream and — while building his own hugely successful insurance company — composed feverishly and in isolation for the next several decades, turning out four symphonies, more than a hundred songs, two piano sonatas and a host of other strikingly original works, few of which he ever heard performed.

“Ives didn’t have to care about making a living with his music,” says Angel Gil-Ordonez, the music director of the PostClassical Ensemble. “And that gave him the freedom and confidence to write what he felt.”

The result was music that married Ives’s American identity, populist philosophy and musical sophistication into music unlike anything else being written. He drew on the sounds of everyday New England life — popular songs and long-forgotten hymns crop up throughout his music — weaving them into exhilarating, wildly colorful tapestries of sound. Determined to free music from its hidebound conventions, he experimented constantly with polytonality, tone clusters, complex rhythms, collage effects, microtones and a raft of other new techniques long before they became part of the accepted language of modern music.

But Ives’s innovations, Horowitz says, pale beside the spiritual power of his music, which seems to embody the “heroic ride to heaven” his father had pointed him toward. A key work on Thursday’s program, for example, is strange and enigmatic “The Unanswered Question,” in which a trumpet repeatedly poses a five-note phrase described by Ives as “the eternal question of existence.”

“The thing that makes Ives’s music matter is its spiritual dimension — the notion that art is a noble enterprise,” Horowitz says. “It’s true that Ives was almost bewilderingly innovative, but if we use innovation as the most important criterion of his greatness, we diminish him. We’re making a different statement: that Ives was a great spirit and a great human being.”

The Post-Classical: No Coats, Ties or Stuffed Shirts

The Washington Post
By Stephen Brookes
Sunday, October 14, 2007

Listen closely to the average symphony orchestra, and you can almost hear it lumbering into extinction. Large-bodied, slow-moving and frighteningly expensive, classical music’s most important institutions seem increasingly like relics of a distant age, kept alive by an audience that gets grayer every year. Most younger listeners are oblivious — they give classical music the same respect they hold for the periwig and pince-nez — but few orchestras are doing much to draw them in, huddling around formulas that haven’t worked for years: formal concerts, disdain for contemporary culture and a numbing attachment to the music of 19th-century Germany.

“There’s a need for fundamental change — the format and the repertoire of the concert needs to be completely rethought,” says Joseph Horowitz, author of the groundbreaking book “Classical Music in America: A History of Its Rise and Fall.” Conductor Angel Gil-Ordóñez agrees: “We cannot do music in the same way, because humanity has changed.”

But Horowitz and Gil-Ordóñez aren’t just criticizing — they’re charging the ramparts. Four years ago they launched an unusual D.C.-based group called the Post-Classical Ensemble as a sort of working laboratory for new ideas. And they’ve turned the traditional model on its head: Unlike traditional orchestras, the ensemble has no fixed size (it’s made up of freelancers hired for specific programs), no fixed home (it’s played everywhere from the Library of Congress to Strathmore), a minuscule budget and complete freedom to take risks.

Read more

Lou Harrison Feted in DC

Musical America
By Brett Campbell
March 14, 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The shimmering, seductive sounds of the Javanese gamelan beguiled American composer Lou Harrison (1917-2003) from the first time he heard them, in 1939 at San Francisco’s Golden Gate Exposition. Harrison [Musical America’s 2002 Composer of the Year] composed dozens of works for gamelan beginning in the mid-1970s, and often called its sound the most beautiful on the planet.

The Post-Classical Ensemble, of which Joseph Horowitz is artistic director, recently presented a mini Harrison festival on the campus of George Washington University, featuring two and one-third of the composer’s finest works. By way of introducing Harrison’s oeuvre to the uninitiated, a symposium on March 4 at the Indonesian Embassy included a brief demonstration and explanation of traditional Javanese gamelan music, drawing a capacity crowd of more than 200. The event also featured a symposium in which Wesleyan University’s gamelan ensemble director and scholar Sumarsam, biographer Bill Alves and Indonesian Ambassador Dino Patti Djalal persuasively distinguished Harrison’s sensitive, thoughtful “confluence” of Western and Asian musical forms from “exotic” cultural forms appropriated by commercial interests.

The discussion/demonstration provided nourishing context for the following evening’s concert in GWU’s Lisner Hall. The Wesleyan gamelan performed Harrison’s jubilant “Bubaran Robert,” with trumpeter Chris Gekker playing his processional phrases on stage and in different parts of the hall. The gamelan ensemble was sensitive throughout, as it was to former Bang on a Can pianist Lisa Moore on the next piece, the first movement of the composer’s brilliant, dramatic 1987 Concerto for Piano and Javanese Gamelan. Horowitz later told me they had decided to omit the other two movements for fear of taxing listeners’ stamina, but truncating such a stirring showpiece left the concert’s first half feeling imbalanced. (The complete work is available on a splendid new recording by Seattle’s Gamelan Pacifica.)

Read more

Post-Classical Ensemble (2007)

The Washington Post
By Stephen Brookes
Monday, March 19, 2007

The Post-Classical Ensemble may be the most thought-provoking music group in town. It’s certainly one of the most innovative, using its concerts as laboratories for musical thought experiments. Often focusing on a single piece — or even a single movement from a single piece — the group probes a work’s cultural “back story,” pulling away layer after layer of context to expose its innermost core. Their performances can be demanding — but they’re invariably beautiful, and never dull.

That was the case Friday night at the Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center, when the ensemble focused on the “The Farewell” — the final movement of Mahler’s song-symphony “Song of the Earth.” Based on translations of three 8th-century Chinese poems, the work is redolent of Eastern influences, and the evening opened by going directly to the roots: traditional Chinese music, followed by a reading (in Chinese) of the original poems that inspired the composer.

Those same poems were also the basis of the next work on the program, a new “Farewell” by composer Zhou Long. It was a masterly work — atmospheric, finely wrought music that captured the delicate melancholy of the poems without ever descending into sentimentality. Long speaks a thoroughly modern language and has one of the most striking sonic imaginations of any composer around, but it was the sheer grace of this music that lingered in the ears.

Read more

Post-Classical Ensemble (2005)

The Washington Post
By Joseph McLellan
Friday, March 18, 2005

Gustav Mahler’s “Das Lied von der Erde” (“The Song of the Earth”) presents a curious combination of late romantic German sensibility in its music and Chinese poetry of the 8th century in the original source of its texts. Its final segment, “Der Abschied” (“The Farewell”), is particularly notable; it describes two friends saying goodbye, perhaps forever, and many admirers have considered it a farewell to life by Mahler, who was suffering from heart disease and nearing death when he composed it.

No single performance can explore all the dimensions of “Der Abschied,” but the interpretation by the Post-Classical Ensemble, Wednesday night at the Austrian Embassy, came brilliantly close. The ensemble, directed by Angel Gil-Ordoñez with a precise sense of idiom and style, used the chamber music reduction by Arnold Schoenberg, which requires only 13 players and preserves all the music’s subtly varied colors. Mezzo-soprano Delores Ziegler sang the text, with a haunting treatment of the final words, “ewig . . . ewig” (“forever . . . forever”) that lingered in memory long after the music had faded to silence.

That ended the program. What came before it was equally fascinating. First a solo on the erhu, a two-stringed fiddle, by Wang Guowei, an extraordinary performer; then an exotically evocative piece, “Moonlit River in Spring,” played on Chinese instruments by four members of the Music From China ensemble.

Read more

Post-Classical, Performing Some Very Good Works

The Washington Post
By Stephen Brookes
Thursday, March 16, 2006

Classical music may be dying a slow death, but not if Joseph Horowitz has anything to say about it. Author of the essential “Classical Music in America,” executive director of the Brooklyn Philharmonic and founder (with Angel Gil-Ordonez) of the Post Classical Ensemble, Horowitz has been dragging classical music out of its High Culture sickbed and giving it a series of healthy kicks.

And on Tuesday night the Ensemble did just that, in a bold concert at the Virginia Theological Seminary titled “Manuel de Falla and the Music of Faith.”

The concert focused on a single movement of a single piece — the 1926 Concerto for Keyboard — which many Falla lovers tend to view with distrust or outright hate.

Read more

Lifting Revueltas Out of Obscurity

The Washington Post
By Daniel Ginsberg
May 3, 2003

The centerpiece of the performance was a screening of the film “Redes,” which coincided with Filmfest DC. Under the skillful Spanish conductor Angel Gil-Ordoñez, the Post-Classical Ensemble performed Revueltas’s score in live accompaniment to this hour-long 1936 film about village fishermen struggling against the power of a monopoly. The orchestra gave a wonderfully lucid account of the score. The phrasing, dynamics and general sound were alive to the evolving sense of desperation, anger and empowerment expressed in the film.

Revueltas’s dirge-like music for the scene in which the hero must bury his son who died after the local overlord refused to pay for medical treatment was heart-rending yet strong. Passages for woodwind, low strings and brass were carefully crafted but not overwrought. Gil-Ordoñez kept everything moving apace and always synced with the images on-screen.

To build up to the tempestuous mood of the film, the concert began with a subtle weaving of popular folk songs from the Mexican Revolution and the composer’s pieces for smaller ensembles. Any skepticism of this merger of popular and art music vanished with the soulful singing of Lila Downs, who appeared in and sang on the soundtrack of “Frida,” the recent film about Mexican artist Frida Kahlo.

Read more
© 2011 PostClassical Ensemble